Government by Dissent: Protest, Resistance, and Radical Democratic Thought in the Early American Republic
Robert W.T. Martin
"The most thorough examination we have of how early Americans wrestled with what types of political dissent should be permitted, even promoted, in the new republic they were forming. Martin shows the modern relevance of their debates in ways that all will find valuable—even those who dissent from his views!"—Rogers M. Smith, Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania
Democracy is the rule of the people. But what exactly does it mean for a people to rule? Which practices and behaviors are legitimate, and which are democratically suspect?
We generally think of democracy as government by consent; a government of, by, and for the people. This has been true from Locke through Lincoln to the present day. Yet in understandably stressing the importance—indeed, the monumental achievement—of popular consent, we commonly downplay or even denigrate the role of dissent in democratic governments. But in Government by Dissent, Robert W.T. Martin explores the idea that the people most important in a flourishing democracy are those who challenge the status quo.
The American political radicals of the 1790s understood, articulated, and defended the crucial necessity of dissent to democracy. By returning to their struggles, successes, and setbacks, and analyzing their imaginative arguments, Martin recovers a more robust approach to popular politics, one centered on the ever-present need to challenge the status quo and the powerful institutions that both support it and profit from it. Dissent has rarely been the mainstream of democratic politics. But the figures explored here—forgotten farmers as well as revered framers—understood that dissent is always the essential undercurrent of democracy and is often the critical crosscurrent. Only by returning to their political insights can we hope to reinvigorate our own popular politics.
Product Details
About Robert W.T. Martin
Reviews for Government by Dissent: Protest, Resistance, and Radical Democratic Thought in the Early American Republic
Common-Place
[] Martin seeks to understand how different Americans envisioned what he calls a & dissentient democracy that & values dissent as an essential core element. As Martin defines his term, dissentient democracy is more than engaging in dissent. It is a belief that democracy only remains healthy when government tolerates or even encourages dissent.
American Historical Review
Martin has given us a gifta timely reminder that ours is a nation born in dissent and nourished on disagreement. With a wealth of illustrative cases he reminds us that we Americans are and always have been a fractious people, and our democracy all the more vital for that.
Terence Ball,Arizona State University The most thorough examination we have of how early Americans wrestled with what types of political dissent should be permitted, even promoted, in the new republic they were forming. Martin shows the modern relevance of their debates in ways that all will find valuableeven those who dissent from his views!
Rogers M. Smith,Christopher H. Browne Distinguished Professor of Political Science, University of Pennsylvania [Martin] dissolves myths about the era of the American Revolution, showing that the years following it were anything but peaceful...Those with interests in the early national period will find Martin's research a must. Essential.
P.D. Travis
Choice
[H]is incorporation of political theory with traditional historical sources, such as newspapers and contemporary political essays, successfully challenges readers to re-think not only the history of dissent in American politics but its current manifestations, benefits, and limitations.
Register of the Kentucky Historical Society
The author of this book makes an important contribution to the intellectual history of the early American republic by showing how 'dissentient' thought encouraged the development of a more populist democratic political ideology between 1776 and 1801...[Martin] gives us a fresh, useful look at earnestly republican and wisely dissenting theorists of the early republic.
The Historian