"George W. Bush, the longest-serving wartime commander in chief in U.S. history, fought a remarkable rhetorical war after 9/11. In Framing the Iraq War Endgame, Erika King and Robert Wells analyze the administration's controversial discourse over Iraq. Their insights reveal much about the way Americans deliberate over global conflicts, foreign policy, the presidency, and ultimately our values as a people. ... Read moreThis study deserves a prominent place on bookshelves inside and outside the Beltway." - Gleaves Whitney, Director, Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies Grand Valley State University "This is a timely and significant work on the paradoxes of defining terrorism as a military problem. Unlike many of America's past conflicts, the Iraq War has been framed within a set of ideological narratives surrounding sub-national conflict. King and Wells identify the nature of these narratives and thoroughly examine their impact on competing policy positions. The Iraqi conflict developed within the context of a nebulous, controversial political position - a belief that the United States could declare war on a concept: terrorism. This book explicates the complexities of victory and defeat in a shadow war. Few have defined the problem so well." - Jonathan R. White, author of Terrorism and Homeland Security 'Through an examination of presidential speeches, elite media coverage, and congressional hearings and debates, the authors provide detailed documentation of thepersistence and success of the 'war on terror' rhetoric over time. In fact, they show that this discursive frame was impervious to criticism.' Presidential Studies Quarterly Show Less