Eisenhower, Science Advice, and the Nuclear Test-Ban Debate, 1945-1963
Benjamin P. Greene
€ 110.78
FREE Delivery in Ireland
Description for Eisenhower, Science Advice, and the Nuclear Test-Ban Debate, 1945-1963
Hardback. Based on extensive research in government archives and private papers, this book analyzes the secret debate within the Eisenhower administration over the pursuit of a nuclear test-ban agreement. Series: Stanford Nuclear Age Series. Num Pages: 376 pages. BIC Classification: 1KBB; 3JJPG; HBJK; HBLW3; JPSF. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 5817 x 3887 x 11. Weight in Grams: 454.
Based on extensive research in government archives and private papers, this book analyzes the secret debate within the Eisenhower administration over the pursuit of a nuclear test-ban agreement. In contrast to much recent scholarship, this study concludes that Eisenhower strongly desired to reach an accord with the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom to cease nuclear weapons testing. For Eisenhower, a test ban would ease Cold War tensions, slow the nuclear arms race, and build confidence toward disarmament; however, he faced continual resistance from his early scientific advisers, most notably Lewis L. Strauss and Edward Teller. Extensive research into previously ... Read more
Show LessProduct Details
Format
Hardback
Publication date
2006
Publisher
Stanford University Press United States
Number of pages
376
Condition
New
Series
Stanford Nuclear Age Series
Number of Pages
376
Place of Publication
Palo Alto, United States
ISBN
9780804754453
SKU
V9780804754453
Shipping Time
Usually ships in 15 to 20 working days
Ref
99-15
About Benjamin P. Greene
Benjamin Greene is Assistant Professor of History at Bowling Green State University in Ohio.
Reviews for Eisenhower, Science Advice, and the Nuclear Test-Ban Debate, 1945-1963
"Greene offers an intriguing argument to explain why the president failed [to negotiate a comprehensive nuclear test-ban treaty with the USSR]. His book is carefully crafted, it is methodologically sound, and it makes a genuine contribution to scholarship on the politics of science and technology in the cold war. Greene's conclusions, however, are bound to be controversial because of what ... Read more