[We] are lucky to have, in book form, an essay on legal interpretation by Justice Scalia...[He] projects a sanguine humor through a robust prose enlivened by sly sallies against what he sees as the gaps in logic of the opposing camp. He is anything but the angry justice of popular myth.
John O. McGinnis, Wall Street Journal [T]he Supreme ... Read moreCourt's highest-profile conservative ... Suggest[s] we ought to junk judicial review as we have known it... The reason, I think, is that Scalia objects not merely to certain decisions of this or prior Courts but to judicial review, American-style, in its entirety. His central aim as a jurist has been to get the federal courts out of the business of adjudicating individual rights.
Garrett Epps, The Nation As this ... book makes clear, Scalia deserves respect for having redefined the mainstream of constitutional discourse, and in a substantially useful way.
Jeffrey Rosen, New Republic Justice Scalia merits praise for the clarity with which he writes and for the careful thought that underlies his writing.
Walter Barthold, New York Law Journal Love him or hate him (it's hard to imagine a neutral opinion), Scalia is a brilliant and engaging writer. This tantalizing short debate with his equally brilliant critics shows just how radical our most conservative justice is.
Kathleen Kahn, San Francisco Chronicle Justice Scalia's well-written and patiently explained theory, augmented and challenged by the commentaries of four scholars, will fascinate and enlighten even those readers, and they are many, whom it does not convince... Justice Scalia merits praise for the clarity with which he writes and for the careful thought that underlies his writing.
Walter Barthold, The Lawyer's Bookshelf Antonin Scalia... confronts four high-powered critics in a short book for the general public
perhaps the first time a sitting justice of the Supreme Court has done so. This is a book for anyone with a serious interest in law and the Constitution.
Carl M. Dibble, Detroit News As the most intellectually consistent and stylistically gifted member of the Supreme Court, Scalia has never hidden his enthusiasm for the American tradition of mistrusting courts and lawyers. The basics of his judicial philosophy are now usefully collated into this volume... Scalia's arguments have shaped the debate in our time; he has gone a long way toward changing how judges interpret the letter of the law.
David Franklin, Slate [Scalia] is formidably persuasive, by turns seductive, fierce, funny, charming
and always brilliant.
Paul Reidinger, American Bar Association Journal A Matter of Interpretation demonstrates both the attraction of Scalia's 'textualist' theory and his qualities as a judicial statesman... [His] elegant essay, the most concise and accessible presentation of his views, argues eloquently that judicial authority can only be based on the statutory or constitutional text.
Michael Greve, Reason An essential volume.
Noah Feldman, Bloomberg View Whether you agree with [Scalia's] views or not, it is hard to think of any other recent Supreme Court justice who has made a comparably great contribution to debates over both statutory interpretation and constitutional theory.
Ilya Somin, Washington Post Scalia was a transformative jurist, one worthy of great admiration... Suffice it to say that in spite of our disagreements, I invariably found Justice Scalia's thinking and prodding to be brilliantly generative of important insights into the way law and legal interpretation ought to proceed.
Laurence H. Tribe, Globe and Mail A Matter of Interpretation is a must read... It was [Scalia's] overall approach to judicial decision-making that inspired a generation of young lawyers and will serve as his most lasting legacy.
Kevin P. Martin, New Boston Post Show Less