"The Failed Promise of Originalism is more comprehensive than prior studies, and Cross presents his findings with admirable clarity and candor . . . The Failed Promise of Originalism largely succeeds in debunking the notion that originalism is comparatively more effective than its rivals at limited judicial discretion."—John W. Compton, Tulsa Law Review "Cross offers the first monograph length, empirical investigation of the practice of originalism at the Supreme Court. The heart of the book is his answer to the question of whether originalism furthers 'the rule of law by constraining ideological judging' . . . Highly recommended."—P. J. Jalie, Choice "Frank Cross demonstrates that originalism is no cure for judicial discretion. The Failed Promise of Originalism should explode the myth that originalism will constrain judges more than other constitutional theories."—Daniel Farber, University of California, Berkeley "Frank Cross's important book breaks new ground. Combining a deep understanding of originalism with sophisticated empirical analysis, The Failed Promise of Originalism challenges originalists to show that their theory can make a practical difference, and at the same time dispels the myth that originalist methods have a strong ideological valence in practice. Cross has produced a very rare commodity—a book that is a must read for both lawyers and political scientists."—Lawrence Solum, Georgetown University