Privatising Criminal Justice: History, Neoliberal Penality and the Commodification of Crime
Christopher Hamerton
€ 51.57
FREE Delivery in Ireland
Description for Privatising Criminal Justice: History, Neoliberal Penality and the Commodification of Crime
Paperback. Num Pages: 256 pages. BIC Classification: 1DBK; JKV; JPP. Category: (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 234 x 156. .
Privatising Criminal Justice explores the social, cultural and political context of privatisation in the criminal justice sector. In recent years, the criminal justice sector has made various strategic partnerships with the private sector, exemplified by initiatives within the police, the prison system and offender services. This has seen unprecedented growth in the past 30 years and a veritable explosion under the tenure of the coalition government in the UK.
This book highlights key areas of domestic and global concern and illustrates, with detailed case studies of important developments. It connects the study of criminology and criminal justice to the ... Read more
Product Details
Format
Paperback
Publication date
2022
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Ltd United Kingdom
Number of pages
256
Condition
New
Number of Pages
302
Place of Publication
London, United Kingdom
ISBN
9781138891173
SKU
V9781138891173
Shipping Time
Usually ships in 4 to 8 working days
Ref
99-3
About Christopher Hamerton
Christopher Hamerton is currently Deputy Director of the Institute of Criminal Justice Research in the School of Economic, Social and Political Sciences at the University of Southampton, UK. Sue Hobbs is Adjunct Fellow with the School of Social Sciences and Psychology at Western Sydney University, Australia. She has wide practice experience in social and criminal justice.
Reviews for Privatising Criminal Justice: History, Neoliberal Penality and the Commodification of Crime
"Almost all State-based criminal justice professionals in recent years have instinctively feared and disliked the ‘privatisation' that they were persistently being threatened with, and fought as best they could to keep their services public. Sometimes, the wider public themselves were indifferent to their struggles (as with probation), and others, more supportive (as with legal aid). What all the struggling agencies ... Read more