.png){kind=logo}
Stock image for illustration purposes only - book cover, edition or condition may vary.
Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Productivist Models of Social Policy
Mason M. S. Kim
€ 66.37
FREE Delivery in Ireland
Description for Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Productivist Models of Social Policy
Hardcover. The author aims to develop conceptual refining and theoretical reframing of the productivist welfare capitalism thesis in order to address a set of questions concerning whether and how productivist welfarism has experienced both continuity and change in East Asia. Num Pages: 183 pages, biography. BIC Classification: 1FP; JKSB; JPRB; KCM; KCR. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 146 x 223 x 16. Weight in Grams: 354.
The author aims to develop conceptual refining and theoretical reframing of the productivist welfare capitalism thesis in order to address a set of questions concerning whether and how productivist welfarism has experienced both continuity and change in East Asia.
The author aims to develop conceptual refining and theoretical reframing of the productivist welfare capitalism thesis in order to address a set of questions concerning whether and how productivist welfarism has experienced both continuity and change in East Asia.
Product Details
Format
Hardback
Publication date
2015
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan
Condition
New
Number of Pages
172
Place of Publication
Basingstoke, United Kingdom
ISBN
9781137471840
SKU
V9781137471840
Shipping Time
Usually ships in 15 to 20 working days
Ref
99-15
About Mason M. S. Kim
Mason M. S. Kim is Assistant Professor, Spelman College, USA. He received his PhD in comparative politics from the University of Pittsburgh. His research interests include the impact of electoral rules and party systems on welfare state development in developing democracies.
Reviews for Comparative Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Productivist Models of Social Policy
“Kim's main thesis is compelling, and any graduate reading list on East Asian social policy would be enriched by the addition of this text, as it succinctly challenges the orthodoxy that there is a singular welfare model for East Asia in a cogent and accessible manner.” (Tom Emery, Social Policy Administration, Vol. 53 (3), May, 2018)