Review from previous edition 'This is unquestionably a major classic of German constitutional theory'
Neil MacCormick
'His theory is now becoming the leading theory of constitutional rights'
Nils Jansen
This work provides one of the most penetrating, analytically refined, and influential general accounts of constitutional rights available. American realists will recognize the structure of rights it ... Read moreproposes as functional and pragmatic. Comparative constitutional jurists will recognize it as a reconstruction of what is, perhaps, the dominant understanding of constitutional rights in the world. It would be a mistake for constitutional scholars of any tradition not to engage this book seriously.
Mattias Kumm
Juian Rivers deserves credit not only for a text which does full justice to Alexy's renowned lucidity, but also for an introduction which argues persuasively for the relevance of Alexy's understanding of constitutional rights.
Legal Studies
... a valuable contribution to our appreciation of the wider context in which both the German Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) and US Supreme Court operate.
European Public Law
... provide(s) us with a stimulating theoretical account of the method of adjudication employed by the judges of the FCC, as well as some insight into the workings and background assumptions of German constitutional law.
European Public Law
... reveal(s) numerous and fruitful points of contact between American and German constitutional law on the one hand, and the emerging case-law under the HRA on the other.
European Public Law
... provides a series of challenging arguments that draw together fine theoretical developments with a clear analysis of the German case law. Undoubtedly, it constitutes a building block of every serious discussion on constitutional rights and everyone who is interested in these issues should compare his views with Alexy's. His subtle analytical distinctions would shed much light over utterly obscure issues such as horizontality, proportionality, scope, and limits of rights. Moreover, a British audience puzzled by the role of a new Bill of Rights would find much relief from a comparative insight on questions of rights. The strength of this book is that it provides a sound framework for initiating a discussion on constitutional rights.
International and Comparative Law Quarterly
Show Less