Baynton, challenging the conventional historiography, argues that the selective phase of American immigration policy, despite its heavy reliance on the -sensible-sounding 'public charge' standard, was no less discriminatory. During those years, he demonstrates, immigration officials could and did customarily invoke this standard to rule out such 'defectives' as women unaccompanied by male providers and members of races with supposed 'predispositions' to criminality. Even those with 'objective' physical impairments (as the Americans with Disabilities Act would underscore many years later) were incapable of work only if you made certain assumptions about how workplaces were to be structured. So beware 'reasonable' justifications for immigration policies, Baynton warns.
New York Times Focusing on immigrant experiences in New York, Baynton explains how ideas about genetics, disability, race, family life, and employment worked together to exclude an extraordinarily diverse range of men and women from the shores of the US.
New Scientist In this slim volume, Douglas C. Baynton forcefully and convincingly argues that, in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, U.S. immigration law and policy had as its core purpose the exclusion of defective immigrants who failed to meet eugenic standards of physical, mental, and moral fitness. In doing so, he successfully challenges standard historical interpretations. . .It is a must read for historians of immigration.
Bulletin of the History of Medicine Defectives in the Land is a supple example of the ways that 'disability' has never been a term with a singular or unified meaning, but a term that has been
and continues to be
misused, abused, and exploited by a range of historical actors and institutions for their own ends. By using deliberately loaded conceptual categories
defective, handicapped, ugly, dependent
to organize his chapters, Baynton's book opens up the deep interrelationships between disability and familiar analytical categories within immigration history, social history, and political history.
David Serlin, University of California, San Diego A well-researched, original, and engaging study. Baynton argues that historians of North American immigration have failed to appreciate the importance of disability in the web of immigration restriction. To correct this failure, he maintains that disability joined race, disease, 'poor physique, ' and poverty to form the ingredients of 'degeneracy.' Beautifully written and based on rigorous scholarship, Defectives in the Land will be of great importance and interest to historians of immigration and disability
and beyond.
James W. Trent, Gordon College In Defectives in the Land, Baynton extends his groundbreaking inquiries into how we've arrived at what we think of as disability in contemporary America. Baynton's is an elegant and incisive analysis of the ways our developing nation evolved cultural practices and attitudes to make 'disability' a concept that gave meaning and status to people who have illnesses, industrial injuries, military wounds, or simply the unexpected forms of human variation life presents. Baynton presents us with the familiar history of American modernization as the creation of modern disability, showing us the shifting criteria for what counts a human 'defect' and what that means in the lives of people who bear such stigma.
Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, Emory University