In The Ocean Hill-Brownsville Conflict Glen Anthony Harris synthesizes and analyzes the works of the major thinkers of these groups and chronicles the nature of the relationship between them during the twentieth century.  Harris’ scholarship is balanced and sound and his analysis intriguing. Thoroughly examining and critiquing the works of prominent twentieth century Jewish and black intellectuals, this book demonstrates ... Read morehow the Ocean Hill-Brownsville conflict represented a convergence of many historical issues that united and divided Jews and blacks.
Learotha Williams, Tennessee State University Repelling a tendency to debate black/Jewish relations through personal interaction and communal contact, Glenn Anthony Harris provides a thorough discussion of the exchanges and debates between black and Jewish intellectuals throughout the 20th century.  Moving beyond a linear historiography, which imagines the pre-1960s as the golden age of black/Jewish relations and the subsequent decades as one of conflict and tension, Harris’ exceptional research forces complexity and depth on this continually important subject.  A story of liberalism, radicalism, and the battle to remake America, The Ocean-Hill Brownsville Conflict offers insight into the often competing and difficult dialogues between black and Jewish intellectuals elucidating how even in disagreement these debates propelled the movement for justice and equality forward.
David J. Leonard, Professor of Critical Culture, Gender, and Race Studies, Washington State University Devoting one chapter to the Ocean Hill-Brownsville conflict that pitted African American district leaders against Jewish teachers and administrators, Harris (Univ. of North Carolina, Wilmington) intriguingly explores at greater length the intellectual and conceptual roots of that clash. He examines the ideas of Jewish and black intellectuals ranging from Franz Boas, Richard Wright, James Baldwin, Kenneth Clark, and Ralph Ellison to Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise, Nathan Glazer, and Norman Podhoretz. Baldwin stated bluntly in the headline of his 1967 New York Times Magazine essay that 'Negroes Are Anti-Semitic Because They're Anti-White.' The psychologist Clark proved more hopeful about black-Jewish relations, although self-identifying Jewish liberals or social democrats—some later turned neoconservative, such as Podhoretz—increasingly expressed concerns by the 1960s. Podhoretz's Commentary magazine was at the heart of many of the intellectual squabbles, including those involving Ellison, who insisted that northern liberals had devolved into 'the new apologists for segregation.' Harris aptly examines the radical turn of the civil rights movement; his chapter on the New Left-Old Left clash fits less neatly. He concludes that US black and Jewish intellectuals sought different things, with the former desiring free engagement and the latter wanting an orderly existence protective of their interests. Summing Up: Recommended.
CHOICE
Glen Anthony Harris offers a look at black-Jewish relations through the writings of public intellectuals, both black and Jewish, spanning the twentieth century....The substance of the book’s discussion is...the intellectual debates between black and Jewish intellectuals.
Journal of American History
Show Less