.png){kind=logo}
Stock image for illustration purposes only - book cover, edition or condition may vary.
Methodological Variance
G.L. Pandit
€ 250.97
FREE Delivery in Ireland
Description for Methodological Variance
Paperback. Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science. Num Pages: 455 pages, biography. BIC Classification: GBC; HPK; PDA. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 234 x 156 x 23. Weight in Grams: 700.
For a philosopher with an abiding interest in the nature of objective knowledge systems in science, what could be more important than trying to think in terms of those very subjects of such knowledge to which men like Galileo, Newton, Max Planck, Einstein and others devoted their entire lifetimes? In certain respects, these systems and their structures may not be beyond the grasp of a linguistic conception of science, and scientific change, which men of science and philosophy have advocated in various forms in recent times. But certainly it is wrong-headed to think that one's conception of science can be ... Read more
For a philosopher with an abiding interest in the nature of objective knowledge systems in science, what could be more important than trying to think in terms of those very subjects of such knowledge to which men like Galileo, Newton, Max Planck, Einstein and others devoted their entire lifetimes? In certain respects, these systems and their structures may not be beyond the grasp of a linguistic conception of science, and scientific change, which men of science and philosophy have advocated in various forms in recent times. But certainly it is wrong-headed to think that one's conception of science can be ... Read more
Product Details
Format
Paperback
Publication date
2012
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Number of pages
455
Condition
New
Series
Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
Number of Pages
431
Place of Publication
Dordrecht, Netherlands
ISBN
9789401054003
SKU
V9789401054003
Shipping Time
Usually ships in 15 to 20 working days
Ref
99-15
Reviews for Methodological Variance